Home Download Help Resources Extensions FAQ NetLogo Publications Contact Us Donate Models: Library Community Modeling Commons Beginners Interactive NetLogo Dictionary User Manuals: Web Printable Chinese Czech Farsi / Persian Japanese Spanish

NetLogo Models Library: 
If you download the NetLogo application, this model is included. You can also Try running it in NetLogo Web 
This model demonstrates diffusionlimited aggregation, in which randomly moving (diffusing) particles stick together (aggregate) to form beautiful treelike branching fractal structures. There are many patterns found in nature that resemble the patterns produced by this model: crystals, coral, fungi, lightning, and so on.
The model begins with an initial green "seed" in the center of the world. Red particles move around the world randomly. When a red particle hits a green square, it "sticks" and turns green (and a new red particle is created to keep the process going).
Press SETUP to make the initial seed, then press GO to run the model.
The WIGGLEANGLE slider controls how wiggly the paths the particles follow are. If WIGGLEANGLE is 0, they move in straight lines. If WIGGLEANGLE is 360, they move in a totally random direction at each time step.
The MAXPARTICLES slider controls how many red particles can exist at the same time.
Both settings may be altered in the middle of a model run.
The USEWHOLEWORLD? switch controls whether the red particles start at the edge of the world, or from just outside a circle enclosing the green area. If the switch is on, it's easier to see what's going on, but the model runs slower, particularly when WIGGLEANGLE is high.
Note that the resulting structure has a branching structure, like a tree. Why does this happen?
What other phenomena in the world do the shapes remind you of? Is this aggregation process a plausible model of how those phenomena occur?
When the enclosing circle gets too near to the edge of the world, the model stops, since allowing the particles to wrap around the edges of the world would distort the shape of the aggregate.
New red particles are created not at the edge of the world, but at the edge of a circle enclosing the current size of the green aggregate, instead of traveling from the edge of the world. Also, if a red particle wanders too far outside the circle, it disappears and a new one is created. Neither of these behaviors is essential to the model  it is done this way just to the model runs fast.
Try different settings for WIGGLEANGLE. What is the effect on the appearance of the resulting aggregate? Why?
Does the MAXPARTICLES slider make any difference? Why or why not?
Do you think the USEWHOLEWORLD? setting has an effect on the appearance of the resulting aggregate? Why or why not? Experiment and find out. If you initially thought differently from what you found, why do you think you thought otherwise? Can you explain why it does happen the way you found?
What happens if you start with more than one "seed" patch? What happens if the seed is a line instead of a point?
Can you find a way to modify the code so the resulting pattern spirals out instead of radiating straight out?
The rule used in this model is that a particle "sticks" if any of the eight patches surrounding it are green. What do the resulting structures look like if you use a different rule (for example, only testing the single patch ahead, or using neighbors4
instead of neighbors
)?
Can you compute the fractal dimension of the aggregate?
If instead of using green, you gradually vary the color of deposited particles over time, you can see more vividly the accretion of "layers" over time. (The effect is also visually pleasing.)
The model will run faster if the turtles are invisible, so you may want to add a switch that hides them (using the hideturtle
command).
Let's use the term "envelope" to describe the large "circle" created by all the green particles, with the green particle that is farthest from the center defining the radius of this envelope. Within this envelope, what is the ratio between patches with green particles and patches that have no particles? Or, what is the ratio between particles and patches? Create a graph to track this ratio. Create a histogram that accumulates the end value of this process over multiple runs.
How circular is the envelope at the end of a simulation? Is it "smooth" or "bumpy"? How would you define the goodness of this circle?
Let's use the term "end particles" to describe the green particles at the end of an outward reaching branch (so they are connected only to one other particle). Create a procedure to calculate and report the average number of nodes along all the possible paths from the center to the end particles). You can also create a histogram of these values.
How many "end particles" are there over time? It seem likely that this number should grow, but how would you expect this number to grow? Create a graph to track the growth in the number of these "end particles."
What is the ratio between "end particles" and nodes? Does this ratio change over time? Create a graph to track this ratio as the simulation runs.
Create a procedure that allows you to click on any two green particles and have another moving particle sprout at the first green particle you clicked and then track and color the path between these two green particles. What is the longest path between any two green particles? Is this number bound above?
Note the use of the neighbors
and distancexy
primitives.
In this model, the green squares are on a grid. For a different implementation of the same idea that does not involve a grid, see DLA Alternate. It uses circular particles that stick to each other.
DLA Alternate Linear has particles that fall straight down from the top of the world, instead of falling towards a central point.
DLA Simple is a simplified (but less computationally efficient) version of this model.
The various models in the "Fractals" subsection of the "Mathematics" section of the Models Library demonstrate some other ways of "growing" fractal structures.
The "Percolation" model in the "Earth Science" section produces patterns resembling the patterns in this model.
The "Hex Cell Aggregation" model in the "Computer Science" section uses a grid of hexagons, rather than squares, and uses a cellular automaton with a growth rule instead of moving particles.
The concept of diffusion limited aggregation was invented by T.A. Witten and L.M. Sander in 1981. Tamas Viczek's book "Fractal Growth Phenomena" contains a discussion, as do many other books about fractals.
If you mention this model or the NetLogo software in a publication, we ask that you include the citations below.
For the model itself:
Please cite the NetLogo software as:
Copyright 1997 Uri Wilensky.
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons AttributionNonCommercialShareAlike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/byncsa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Commercial licenses are also available. To inquire about commercial licenses, please contact Uri Wilensky at uri@northwestern.edu.
This model was created as part of the project: CONNECTED MATHEMATICS: MAKING SENSE OF COMPLEX PHENOMENA THROUGH BUILDING OBJECTBASED PARALLEL MODELS (OBPML). The project gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation (Applications of Advanced Technologies Program)  grant numbers RED #9552950 and REC #9632612.
This model was developed at the MIT Media Lab using CM StarLogo. See Wilensky, U. (1993). Thesis  Connected Mathematics: Building Concrete Relationships with Mathematical Knowledge. Adapted to StarLogoT, 1997, as part of the Connected Mathematics Project. Adapted to NetLogo, 2002, as part of the Participatory Simulations Project.
This model was converted to NetLogo as part of the projects: PARTICIPATORY SIMULATIONS: NETWORKBASED DESIGN FOR SYSTEMS LEARNING IN CLASSROOMS and/or INTEGRATED SIMULATION AND MODELING ENVIRONMENT. The project gratefully acknowledges the support of the National Science Foundation (REPP & ROLE programs)  grant numbers REC #9814682 and REC0126227. Converted from StarLogoT to NetLogo, 2002.
(back to the NetLogo Models Library)