NetLogo Models Library:
## WHAT IS IT?
In some networks, a few "hubs" have lots of connections, while everybody else only has a few. This model shows one way such networks can arise.
Such networks can be found in a surprisingly large range of real world situations, ranging from the connections between websites to the collaborations between actors.
This model generates these networks by a process of "preferential attachment", in which new network members prefer to make a connection to the more popular existing members.
## HOW IT WORKS
The model starts with two nodes connected by an edge.
At each step, a new node is added. A new node picks an existing node to connect to randomly, but with some bias. More specifically, a node's chance of being selected is directly proportional to the number of connections it already has, or its "degree." This is the mechanism which is called "preferential attachment."
## HOW TO USE IT
Pressing the GO ONCE button adds one new node. To continuously add nodes, press GO.
The LAYOUT? switch controls whether or not the layout procedure is run. This procedure attempts to move the nodes around to make the structure of the network easier to see.
The PLOT? switch turns off the plots which speeds up the model.
The RESIZE-NODES button will make all of the nodes take on a size representative of their degree distribution. If you press it again the nodes will return to equal size.
If you want the model to run faster, you can turn off the LAYOUT? and PLOT? switches and/or freeze the view (using the on/off button in the control strip over the view). The LAYOUT? switch has the greatest effect on the speed of the model.
If you have LAYOUT? switched off, and then want the network to have a more appealing layout, press the REDO-LAYOUT button which will run the layout-step procedure until you press the button again. You can press REDO-LAYOUT at any time even if you had LAYOUT? switched on and it will try to make the network easier to see.
## THINGS TO NOTICE
The networks that result from running this model are often called "scale-free" or "power law" networks. These are networks in which the distribution of the number of connections of each node is not a normal distribution --- instead it follows what is a called a power law distribution. Power law distributions are different from normal distributions in that they do not have a peak at the average, and they are more likely to contain extreme values (see Albert & Barabási 2002 for a further description of the frequency and significance of scale-free networks). Barabási and Albert originally described this mechanism for creating networks, but there are other mechanisms of creating scale-free networks and so the networks created by the mechanism implemented in this model are referred to as Barabási scale-free networks.
You can see the degree distribution of the network in this model by looking at the plots. The top plot is a histogram of the degree of each node. The bottom plot shows the same data, but both axes are on a logarithmic scale. When degree distribution follows a power law, it appears as a straight line on the log-log plot. One simple way to think about power laws is that if there is one node with a degree distribution of 1000, then there will be ten nodes with a degree distribution of 100, and 100 nodes with a degree distribution of 10.
## THINGS TO TRY
Let the model run a little while. How many nodes are "hubs", that is, have many connections? How many have only a few? Does some low degree node ever become a hub? How often?
Turn off the LAYOUT? switch and freeze the view to speed up the model, then allow a large network to form. What is the shape of the histogram in the top plot? What do you see in log-log plot? Notice that the log-log plot is only a straight line for a limited range of values. Why is this? Does the degree to which the log-log plot resembles a straight line grow as you add more nodes to the network?
## EXTENDING THE MODEL
Assign an additional attribute to each node. Make the probability of attachment depend on this new attribute as well as on degree. (A bias slider could control how much the attribute influences the decision.)
Can the layout algorithm be improved? Perhaps nodes from different hubs could repel each other more strongly than nodes from the same hub, in order to encourage the hubs to be physically separate in the layout.
## NETWORK CONCEPTS
There are many ways to graphically display networks. This model uses a common "spring" method where the movement of a node at each time step is the net result of "spring" forces that pulls connected nodes together and repulsion forces that push all the nodes away from each other. This code is in the `layout-step` procedure. You can force this code to execute any time by pressing the REDO LAYOUT button, and pressing it again when you are happy with the layout.
## NETLOGO FEATURES
Nodes are turtle agents and edges are link agents. The model uses the ONE-OF primitive to chose a random link and the BOTH-ENDS primitive to select the two nodes attached to that link.
The `layout-spring` primitive places the nodes, as if the edges are springs and the nodes are repelling each other.
Though it is not used in this model, there exists a network extension for NetLogo that comes bundled with NetLogo, that has many more network primitives.
## RELATED MODELS
See other models in the Networks section of the Models Library, such as Giant Component.
See also Network Example, in the Code Examples section.
## CREDITS AND REFERENCES
This model is based on:
Albert-László Barabási. Linked: The New Science of Networks, Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pages 79-92.
For a more technical treatment, see:
Albert-László Barabási & Reka Albert. Emergence of Scaling in Random Networks, Science, Vol 286, Issue 5439, 15 October 1999, pages 509-512.
Barabási's webpage has additional information at: http://www.barabasi.com/
The layout algorithm is based on the Fruchterman-Reingold layout algorithm. More information about this algorithm can be obtained at: http://emr.cs.iit.edu/~reingold/force-directed.pdf.
For a model similar to the one described in the first suggested extension, please consult:
W. Brian Arthur, "Urban Systems and Historical Path-Dependence", Chapt. 4 in Urban systems and Infrastructure, J. Ausubel and R. Herman (eds.), National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C., 1988.
## HOW TO CITE
If you mention this model or the NetLogo software in a publication, we ask that you include the citations below.
For the model itself:
* Wilensky, U. (2005). NetLogo Preferential Attachment model. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/models/PreferentialAttachment. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Please cite the NetLogo software as:
* Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. http://ccl.northwestern.edu/netlogo/. Center for Connected Learning and Computer-Based Modeling, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
## COPYRIGHT AND LICENSE
Copyright 2005 Uri Wilensky.
![CC BY-NC-SA 3.0](http://ccl.northwestern.edu/images/creativecommons/byncsa.png)
This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License. To view a copy of this license, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ or send a letter to Creative Commons, 559 Nathan Abbott Way, Stanford, California 94305, USA.
Commercial licenses are also available. To inquire about commercial licenses, please contact Uri Wilensky at email@example.com.
<!-- 2005 -->