The emerging field of "complexity," or "complex
adaptive systems," studies the dynamics of systems made up of a
great number of independent agents interacting in many ways, and
often resulting in self-organization. A common characteristic of
these systems is that complex population-level behavior frequently
comes from simple agents following quite uncomplicated rules.
An oft-cited example used to illustrate the spirit of the
complexity perspective is the behavior of a flock of birds.
Agent-based simulations of flocking birds consist of only three
simple rules for individual bird movement that can loosely be
summarized as follows: 1) move towards the birds near you, 2) align
yourself with the direction of those birds, but 3) don't get to
close to any one bird. Surprisingly, these three simple rules can
reproduce many sophisticated group-level flocking patterns.
This example, and many others like it, capture a key insight
from the complex systems perspective: without any central
coordination, seemingly intelligent and goal-directed system-level
behavior can emerge from the simple, local interactions of
individual agents. Moreover, we cannot truly understand the behavior
of the system (or what some might even call its
"collective intelligence") without considering both the group and
individual levels of a system at once - i.e., no matter how deeply
we investigate the anatomy of anindividual bird we cannot see the
flock, but similarly there is nothing in the resulting patterns of
group-level flight that do not come from the actions of individual
birds.
A basic premise of this project is that just like the
difficulties of using a single-level lens to understand the behavior
of other complex adaptive systems, the behavior of schools and
school districts cannot be fully understood without adopting a
dynamic, multi-level perspective.
Much controversy surrounds choice-based reforms in education. On
one hand, proponents of choice-based reforms claim that giving
parents the ability tochoose the school their children attend
provides both access to better schooling for disadvantaged
populations as well as the incentives necessary forschool reform.
On the other hand, opponents of school choice claim
that choice-based programs will not bring about the hoped for
improvements in schools, but instead only drain resources from
troubled schools that can least afford to lose them
While both proponents and opponents to school choice either
explicitly or implicitly make assumptions about the mechanisms that
tie household- and school-level choices to aggregate performance,
little work has explored these mechanisms themselves. In this
project we apply the complex systems perspective, and the
agent-based modeling approach in particular, to school choice reform
to gain a greater understanding of how state- or
district-level performance relates to individual- and school-level
behavior, and to identify potential leverage points for action
within such reforms. Of particular initial interest is the
exploration of the natural selection and competition
mechanisms assumed to be at work in most of the arguments of both
school choice proponents and opponents.
Leave No Turtle Behind: An Agent-Based Simulation of School
Choice Dynamics. The annual meeting of the American Educational
Research Association, Montreal, Canada, April 11 - 15, 2005.
Modeling School Districts as Complex Adaptive Systems: A
Simulation of Market-Based Reform. The 3rd Lake Arrowhead Conference
on Human Complex Systems. Lake Arrowhead, California, May 18 - 22,
2005.
|
Principal Investigators
Louis Gomez, Uri Wilensky
|
Graduate Student Researchers
Spiro Maroulis, Eytan Bakshy
|
The Educational Policy Simulation project gratefully
acknowledges the support of The Searle Foundation.